Editorial policy
How we write and fact-check
This document spells out our principles and our commitments to the reader: what we do for quality and where we draw lines.
Core principles
Usefulness over volume
We publish no more than 3–5 articles per week and we hard-cap the rate intentionally. Anything below grade C on our internal quality scale stays as a draft, not on the site.
Real authors
Every article carries a specific human being with a biography, experience and an area of expertise. Authors are listed publicly and each article links to the author profile.
Sources are named
Whenever an article cites a figure, a study or a quote, we name the primary source — the report, the organisation, the publication. The full source list shows at the end of each article in the "Sources" block.
Outbound is nofollow
All external links carry rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer". We do not pass link equity outwards and we do not sell links.
How we use AI
Part of our material goes through an AI assistant during the research and first-draft stage. That is not a secret — we are open about it because what matters is transparency, not the presence of AI itself.
What AI does NOT do here:
- Does not publish without an editor in the loop.
- Does not invent statistics, sources, names or quotes — every fact must have a primary source named.
- Does not slide into mass production: the 3–5/week cap is strict.
- Does not write in obvious "AI markers" — we run an automated linter that flags template patterns and sends material back for revision.
What the editor does:
- Approves topics before they go to production.
- Verifies facts against primary sources.
- Holds back pieces with low quality scores or AI-style writing.
- Assigns a real author by topic fit and signs the article.
Quality control
Every piece passes through two independent checkpoints: a structural one (headings, length, keyword density, presence of sources) and a stylistic one (forbidden AI tropes and template phrasings). The minimum grade for publication on our A–F scale is C. Anything below that is either rewritten or never ships.
Corrections and updates
If you find an error in a piece — write to us and we will fix it. Substantial updates (new data, regulatory changes, retracted sources) are flagged explicitly: the updated date moves forward and a note at the end of the article describes what changed.
Report an issueIndependence and partnerships
The blog belongs to GetOffers and discusses, among other things, the problems the product addresses. We mention the platform openly where it fits the argument, but we never sell coverage as analysis. Sponsored material is labelled clearly at the top of the article.
Contact the editorial team
For partnerships, contributions and corrections — write to us.
Contact us